On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 05:46:38PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Hello, > > 2009 m. February 27 d., Friday, Joshua Rodman ra????: > > If the emacs feature of cmake must depend upon emacs-common, then the > > correct solution is to break this feature into cmake-emacs-whatever, > > recommend that, and have that depend upon emacs-common. > Just for the sake of small syntax highlithing files? That's called archive > bloat. > > > Installing undesired irrelevant infrastructure isn't entirely innocuous. > > It's a sort of a feature-creep problem. > Unless you provide me with good rationalle (e.g. how emacsen-common > breaks/bloats/whatever your system), I don't consider this as a problem at > all. And no, such arguments as "I don't want to have anything *emacs* > installed" do not really count for me. > > > This may be of lesser importance than the original problem, but it's > > still bad. Should I open an independent bug? > Well, you can, but I will close or tag it wontfix immediatelly unless you > provide really good justified arguments for me to change my mind. So far, I > have not heard any (only your personal opinion that it is wrong).
Apparently, you believe that installing unrelated software and packages is not in any way a problem, therefore there is nothing I can do to convince you. Have a nice life. -josh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
