tag 516225 moreinfo thanks On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:46:42PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Woody Suwalski <wo...@suwalski.net> [2009-02-20 08:20]: > > Unfortunately I think that it is the case. > > However (unofficially) Martin U have mentioned once that there was a libc > > hack to actually permit old StrongARM to boot armel? > > Could U send me more info (in case I have too much time on my hands ;-)) > > I don't know any details about it, but please ask woo...@wookware.org > He should know or be able to point you at the right information.
So is this discussion an indication that we should wait with the removal or should we go ahead? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <dj...@debian.org> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
