On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:10:41PM +0000, Julian Gilbey <j...@debian.org> was 
heard to say:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:09:40AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:08:41PM +0000, Julian Gilbey <j...@debian.org> 
> > was heard to say:
> > > Then there's this:
> > > 
> > > burnside:~ # ls /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/
> > > 01autoremove    20archive              90rkhunter
> > > 10periodic      50unattended-upgrades  99-localepurge
> > > 15update-stamp  70debconf              99update-notifier
> > > 
> > > I don't know if any of these would be of significance?
> > 
> >   If you grep for "available" or "/var/lib/dpkg" in those, does
> > anything interesting show up?
> 
> The culprit seems to be dpkg itself; at the end of running "dpkg
> --unpack ..." (called from aptitude), the available file is updated
> (or at least touched); the same happened at the end of "dpkg
> --configure ...".
> 
> Turns out this has been reported against dpkg itself, so I guess the
> severity of this aptitude bug should be returned to wishlist.

  Better yet, it can be reassigned to dpkg and merged with the existing
bug.

  Daniel



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to