On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > In #512780 (http://bugs.debian.org/512780), we've requested the creation > of a debian-wbadm list to serve as a role address and discussion umbrella > for the wanna-build team. The full rationale is in the bug report, but > the bottom line is that we've realized a public role address is better > from our past experiences with debian-release. > > Listmaster has asked us that we follow the standard procedure of getting > people to express their interest on the requested list in the bug report. > So, if you'd welcome the wanna-build maintenance team move to a public > list as their role address, we would appreciate if you could send a > quick mail to the bug report.
I agree it would be useful, debian-rele...@l.d.o already started to collect binnmus request in the past and it would seem natural to me that such request (now properly directed at the wbadm team) get archived/discussed in the same spirit on a dedicated list hosted at lists.debian.org. I don't care for the precise name, -wbadm or -wb-admin both seem fine. > Additionally, listmaster has also suggested that we use a teams.debian.net > list for this purpose. I don't agree with this for the reasons stated in > the bug report. Feel free to comment on this issue as well. I agree with your reasons (it's a core d.o infrastructure) and the same reasons led me to remember you that you should really create a wiki page on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams :) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
