(I helped the submitter work around this bug on IRC.) On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 01:21:51AM +0100, Trutz Behn wrote: > Preparing to replace libgbf-1-dev 0.1.3-2 (using > ..../libgbf-1-dev_0.2.4-1_i386.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement libgbf-1-dev ... > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/libgbf-1-dev_0.2.4-1_i386.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/gnome-build-1.0/backends/libgbf-am.la', > which is also in package libgbf-1-0 > Errors were encountered while processing: > /var/cache/apt/archives/libgbf-1-dev_0.2.4-1_i386.deb
It seems libgfb-am.la has moved from the binary package to the -dev package. For this reason, libgbf-1-dev >= 0.2 should probably have libgbf-1-0 in its Conflicts/Replaces. Kind regards, Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
