Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes: > Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes:
>> I'm going to try regenerating the package list by hand and see if I come >> up with any different results. > Running list-binpkg by hand returns the correct listing and source > value. I wonder if I didn't clean the laboratory as thoroughly as I > thought I had. After I upload the next release, I'll do another full > archive run to test both this and the memory leak fix. I unfortunately can now confirm that this is still broken. I checked the binary-packages listing and it had the right value for the source version, but after a full run (with harness -f), the value in the binary-packages list is wrong again. gluck:/org/lintian.debian.org/laboratory/info> grep aufs-modules-2.6.26-1-486 binary-packages aufs-modules-2.6.26-1-486;2.6.26+0+20080719-6;linux-modules-extra-2.6;2.6.26+0+20080719-6;pool/main/l/linux-modules-extra-2.6/aufs-modules-2.6.26-1-486_2.6.26+0+20080719-6_i386.deb;1229775426 This claims the binary package with version 2.6.26+0+20080719-6 was built from a source package with the same version. However, this is clearly wrong: gluck:/org/lintian.debian.org/laboratory/binary/aufs-modules-2.6.26-1-486> dpkg -I deb | grep Source Source: linux-modules-extra-2.6 (2.6.26-6) I don't understand what's failing in the code and I've looked at it a couple of times now. I think it needs more eyeballs. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
