Raphael Geissert <atomo64+deb...@gmail.com> writes: > Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > [...] >> I'm getting : >> [...] >> libmx4j-java source: missing-build-dependency-for-dh_-command >> dh_nativejava=java-gcj-compat-dev >> [...] >> >> but libmx4j-java Build-Depends on default-jdk-builddep >> which in turn Depends on default-jdk >> which Depends on java-gcj-compat-dev. >> >> I don't want to add explicit B-D on java-gcj-compat-dev package. > > That's exactly what you should do; if default-jdk stops depending on > java-cgj-compat-dev, or default-jdk-builddep stops depending on > default-jdk, your package will fail to build. You should not rely on > whether a build dependency pulls another package if you use something > from that other package. If it was used only by some component of, for > example, default-jdk then neither lintian would know you use it nor you > should depend on it.
In general, I agree with this, but in this specific case, I think this is the purpose of that package. Package: default-jdk-builddep Description: Standard Java or Java compatible build dependencies This package points to the build dependencies used to build packages requiring a Java or Java compatible Development Kit. I think the intention of this package is to be a sort of "build-essential" for Java packages, so one can view the debhelper script as part of its defined interface. I think we need to add this one as a special exception. I'll do that now. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
