On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:40:30PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:55:17PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > > That makes the mirrors happy because the aspell dict is now arch:all, but > > does not cause hashes being rebuilt if a new aspell with incompatible binary > > hash format is uploaded. That is what ispell-autobuildhash is currently > > doing and is what is expected from aspell-autobuildhash. There are some > > problems pending, like a /usr/lib/aspell-0.60 explicitely hardcoded path > > that > > will complicate a transition to e.g. 0.61, while everything would be > > simpler if a plain /usr/lib/aspell is used. These are the kind of things > > that are still to be considered. > > Can local/extra dirs be selected besides /usr/lib/aspell-0.60?
At runtime, yes. At configure time, there are --enable-pkgdatadir=DIR and --enable-pkglibdir=DIR, but I believe you cannot specify multiple directories for those. > Something > like aspell looking for dicts and datas in both > > /usr/lib/aspell-0.60 > /usr/lib/aspell-auto > > Something like this would be good for the autobuildhash stuff, if the > auto-dicts are installed in /usr/lib/aspell-auto. This way, when > upgrading to e.g., aspell-0.61 autobuilt hashes will be rebuilt and found by > the new aspell at /usr/lib/aspell-auto, new aspell stuff would be installed > in /usr/lib/aspell-0.61 and obsolete dicts at /usr/lib/aspell-0.60 would be > ignored. Wouldn't you want to clean up the obsolete dicts? I don't really understand what you're trying to accomplish. Are you trying to support *both* old school dictionaries (with the hash files packaged) and new ones where the hash is autobuilt? -- Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to pretend to like each other. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
