Raphael Geissert <atomo64+deb...@gmail.com> writes: > Attached mbox has two patches, one implementing > font-in-non-font-package, and the second one implementing > duplicate-font-file.
Looks like we both did the former at the same time. :) > I implemented the former check as wishlist and not pedantic because > there is no reason to do it that way. My POV is that pedantic checks > should be those for which one would normally not file a bug, not even as > wishlist. In this case if I think a font could be re-used I would > definitely file a report with severity wishlist. Yup, this is a good point. I've changed the implementation that I committed to match. A pure filename match on the fonts I think is only certainty: possible. I made that adjustment after committing. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
