On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:51:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > Most of the rdeps should only need headers and possibly a .a provided in > > > the -dev-bin package. There shouldn't be anything needing iceape-browser > > > files, but that's only an assumption. That's why I asked to check > > > whether they build without iceape-browser installed. > > > > Ok, I'll try a few test builds tonight and post my findings to this bug. > > I've built a trimmed-down iceape, which only leaves iceape-dev and > iceape-dev-bin. > > The results so far (some packages still need to be built, since they're > somewhat > large. For some reason we've seem to stuffed Xulrunner into the largest > packages > in Debian :-) > > Not in Lenny: > gecko-mediaplayer > > Worked: > vlc > gnome-chemistry-utils > gtk-vnc > mozilla-bonobo > totem > mplayerplug-in > rhythmbox > > Not tested yet: > gcj-4.2 > openoffice.org > gcj-4.3 > cacao-oj6 > eclipse > openjdk-6 > > Failed: > mozilla-traybiff > icedtea-gcjwebplugin > classpath > > The last three all failed to link against xpcom. Since icedove provides a > libxpcom.so, do you think it might be possible to adapt builds deps to it?
I think it might be possible to just add it (and libxpcom_core.so) to the iceape-dev-bin package, with a conflict with iceape-browser. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
