On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:03:41 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:38:18 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I looked at the patch; did you mean to add --bugs option only for 0.0.95 
> > release ?
> 
> Yes, definitely.
> 
> Please apply the patch to your git repository, tag the new release and
> upload it to the Debian archive (assuming that everything looks OK).
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> > I thought you wanted to fix aptcleanup?
> 
> That will be for 0.0.96 release, as soon as I am ready to send new
> patches with git-format-patch (stay tuned!).

Hi again, Junichi.

I've just noticed that you applied my patch to the apt-listbugs public
git repository (thank you!), but then committed another modification in
order to mark this new version as UNRELEASED, since you haven't yet
uploaded it to the Debian archive.

I assume that you are performing some tests and quality checks (good!):
I would like to make it clear that, as I previously said, version
0.0.95 is ready to be uploaded to the Debian archive, as far as I am
concerned.
Future changes from me are intended for version 0.0.96 and later ones.
As a consequence, I ask you to upload version 0.0.95 to the Debian
archive, as soon as you are satisfied with it.

Thanks again.

-- 
 On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND
 "nano-documents" may lead you to my website...  
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpSXHyISsESB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to