--On Friday, January 23, 2009 3:27 PM -0700 Rob Sims
<debbug...@robsims.com> wrote:
Thanks for the prompt response.
I think it's reasonable to not have to generate a certificate/key pair
(and possibly a CA certificate if you're cloning a database you don't
own) that are unused because the server side doesn't offer TLS.
Agreed. I would highly advise filing this and the documentation
suggestions upstream (http://www.openldap.org/its/) as that's what would
actually get them resolved. There's an active doc writer on the project
now. They should be filed as separate ITSes (one for the TLS bits, one for
the doc updates).
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
