On 04/01/09 at 02:50 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Package: developers-reference > Version: 3.4.0 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > “3.3 Voting” says: > | You don't have to track the pre-vote discussions, as the secretary will > issue > | several calls for votes on <debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org> (and all > | developers are expected to be subscribed to that list). Democracy doesn't > work > | well if people don't take part in the vote, which is why we encourage all > | developers to vote. Voting is conducted via GPG-signed/encrypted email > | messages. > > That's what I've been thinking for years now, but that doesn't seem to be > correct. As pointed out to me some weeks ago, vote.debian.org[1] only mentions > debian-vote@: > | 1. The electronic mailing list designated is debian-v...@lists.debian.org. > This > | is the authoritative source of the full text of all resolutions, as well as > the > | supporting arguments and other material. Proposals, or sponsorship motions > | shall not be recognized if sent to any other mailing list. > > 1. http://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal.en.html > > While I think sending call for votes to dda@ is a very nice thing, it only > looks like being an habit. It'd be nice to either fix your statement, or > discuss it with vote.debian.org people (and maybe reassigning accordingly), or > slap me with the bits I may have missed. > > If you want to thank someone, that would be Thomas Weber (X-Debbugs-CC'd). > > Thanks for your time.
Hi KiBi, Right, let's both try to remember to mention that to the new secretary (when announced). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
