Hi Jonas!I don't know why my mail to the bugtracker was rejected (the address is the same I used for Sugar bugs the last few days and it's certainly not "unroutable"), so I'm forwarding to your personal mail address.
CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/
--- Begin Message ---Hi. This is the qmail-send program at smtp.chost.de. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <512...@bugs.debian.org>: 140.211.166.43 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550-Verification failed for <sascha-debian-bugs-suga...@silbe.org> 550-Unrouteable address 550 Sender verify failed Giving up on 140.211.166.43. --- Below this line is a copy of the message. Return-Path: <sascha-debian-bugs-suga...@silbe.org> Received: (qmail 29571 invoked by uid 5015); 20 Jan 2009 22:59:29 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 3188 invoked by uid 8193); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:47:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:47:30 +0100 From: Sascha Silbe <sascha-debian-bugs-suga...@silbe.org> To: 512...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#512258: sugar-web-activity: drop-down input fields (HTML forms) not working Message-ID: <20090120224730.gi24...@twin.sascha.silbe.org> References: <20090119004625.10295.41493.report...@aquarium.local> <20090119044209.gm24...@jones.dk> <20090119142113.gc5...@twin.sascha.silbe.org> <20090119145229.go24...@jones.dk> <20090120115335.gd24...@twin.sascha.silbe.org> <20090120143411.gw24...@jones.dk> <20090120215918.gh24...@twin.sascha.silbe.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Li7ckgedzMh1NgdW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090120215918.gh24...@twin.sascha.silbe.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) --Li7ckgedzMh1NgdW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:59:18PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: > So either some non-Sugar package from sid really slipped in (any way=20 > to check that?) Just checked all packages manually using "dpkg --get-selections" and=20 "apt-cache policy". The only non-Sugar packages not from lenny are some=20 codec-related ones from debian-multimedia.org and the latest=20 network-manager version from sid (0.6.6-3) that was supposed to have a=20 bugfix for #491826 [1]. Though I could have overlooked some package, I doubt it. Will build a lenny + Sugar from sid based VM next. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D491826 CU Sascha --=20 http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ --Li7ckgedzMh1NgdW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBSXZUgrpz82VMF3DaAQKBIggArXePxUarcCasIv7jYQ4PVy2GDYWeLv7j nUws2m7r8bk2VJktLosUgW0nNisW4f512avTradom7wQ5wBdy+31epqdNBxb8yjc Yys96QDIH1HTefjf3iuC1XgH1jmVrFqYiI0EKq/XsT2KLi8G50BEbWgTpyUBIJ02 7zPVGFfckvvwYFQUZ31Anl+DscOBeNY97dIJCgAF4kwzf4u/YjBieMsPxFd6nYBT UZGUCotjmvKixXJe4S6aQzDRAm+u1gQ+f3cqoyHqbXrmdlkZLpK9mAri0nhnEN0X WN5OkVwyahlLMxnj92/QTptkbpUz1st74RySA/CAdwPNluHmmNXuVA== =7of3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Li7ckgedzMh1NgdW--
--- End Message ---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
