On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:47:15AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:50:38PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > I've been trying to devise a way to allow for multiple maintainers to > > share the responsibility of signing logs. Switching the recipient > > address works, but only if absences are known ahead of time - and that > > also doesn't facilitate load balancing. > > Well, the changes of binaries built but not yet signed are available in > ~buildd/build on the buildd and their corresponding logs in ~buildd/logs. > So if you have access to the buildd it would also be easy to hack up > a little script to sign packages. It would still require coordination > with the main buildd admin because work is duplicated otherwise but > we are talking of absences here.
I do not plan to give other people access to my buildd. I had over the buildd to Frederik at regular intervals. I just tell him what the last log I signed was. When I get back I just look at my buildd/build dir to see which changes files are still there so I know which logs I need to sign. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
