On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 02:32:21PM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 02:04:09PM +0200, Matthias Czapla wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 09:40:07AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote: > > > Eep, yes that sounds broken. Does this happen with the 4.2.1/4.2.2 > > > version? In experimental or http://the.earth.li/~huggie/xfce4/ > > I'm sorry but currently I don't have access to a spare box for > > experiments :(
> > Provided there will be a fix for 4.0.x, is there any chance that this > > kind of fix will make it into a future update release of sarge? > > Otherwise I'll have to go the mixed versions route or hope for a > > backport anyway. > There won't be any fix for sarge as that would imply this was a security > bug rather than an annoyance. > We'll put 4.2 in unstable soon and I intend to backport that to sarge > (shouldn't be too tricky at this early stage) so if you're interested > then keep checking the http://pkg-xfce.alioth.debian.org/ page. Do you run unstable, testing/etch or stable/sarge? 4.2.2 has hit unstable now. Simon. -- oOoOo '<blitz> mais g la productivité d'une endive :)' #parinux oOoOo oOoOo oOoOo oOoOo oOoOo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
