[bug not cced so sending again Raphael Hertzog schrieb: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Christoph Egger wrote: >> The django module contrib.common seems to not be valid XHTML 1.0 >> Strict. As far as I understand it every <input> is required to be >> placed in e.g an yp> or <div> and may not be placed directly into the >> <form>. > > Do you have a reference for this claim? > > Cheers,
Hi My argumentation is based on the observation, that [1] fails to validate in [3] while [2] passes. [1] is directly rendered by django using [0] as template while [2] puts all hidden inputs into an <p></p> block. Attached: [0] test.tpl [1] rendered [2] modified [3] http://validator.w3.org -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0x0372275D \ / Campaign : X against HTML : Working for Debian / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/Title: Title
{% load comments %}
{% render_comment_form for entry %}
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
