On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 03:51:04PM +1100, Tom Evans wrote: > Or is it the famous "undefined behaviour"? That would then mean it's procps' fault.
>> I wish the GCC documentation was written >> a little clearer. > > Could you please give me a pointer to which GCC docs cover dynamic > libraries? http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Attributes.html (scroll down to constructors) Why don't they mention the priority ranges or lowest wins? Or if there are two constructors which one goes first, even "its not defined" would of been better. Also it doesn't say what the default priority is. To think, a few more words would of made life so much easier :( Setting the priority will fix it for procps, but it may be masking a bug in the GCC; not THIS bugs problem for sure but it should be fixed. Next release I'll set the priority, at the very least it makes it clear what I want the code to do. - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
