On 2009-01-13 04:53:30 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > The POSIX.1 spec says something different, much closer to the Linux > > man page: > > I've checked that, and I think there's a contradiction between POSIX and > the ISO C on this point. I've just sent a mail to the mailing-list of the > austin group: > > https://www.opengroup.org/sophocles/show_mail.tpl?CALLER=show_archive.tpl&source=L&listname=austin-group-l&id=11809
The wording in POSIX will change. See Enhancement Request Number 20 on http://www.opengroup.org/austin/aardvark/latest/xshbug3.txt Also, according to Geoff Clare, glibc seems to follow the C standard (at least in some cases), not the current wording in POSIX. Someone may need to check more closely at its source. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
