Hi,

On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 23:59 +0800, LI Daobing wrote:

> libm17n-dev already ships the .pc files, so the .la files should no longer
> shipped. check more information in
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
> 
> $ dpkg -L libm17n-dev | grep la$
> /usr/lib/libm17n-core.la
> /usr/lib/libm17n-flt.la
> /usr/lib/libm17n-gd.la
> /usr/lib/libm17n-gui.la
> /usr/lib/libm17n-X.la
> /usr/lib/libm17n.la
> /usr/lib/m17n-lib/libmimx-anthy.la
> /usr/lib/m17n-lib/libmimx-ispell.la

Are you referring to:

"Removing .la files and replacing them by pkgconfig files remove the
requirement. However, the transition needs to be coordinated in
leaf-first order, or will cause problems found in libXcursor and
libXrender. Bug# 363239 and Bug# 363057."

Are you saying there are no leaf-nodes depending on libm17n-dev that
require libtool support?

cya,
#




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to