Hi, On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 23:59 +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> libm17n-dev already ships the .pc files, so the .la files should no longer > shipped. check more information in > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html > > $ dpkg -L libm17n-dev | grep la$ > /usr/lib/libm17n-core.la > /usr/lib/libm17n-flt.la > /usr/lib/libm17n-gd.la > /usr/lib/libm17n-gui.la > /usr/lib/libm17n-X.la > /usr/lib/libm17n.la > /usr/lib/m17n-lib/libmimx-anthy.la > /usr/lib/m17n-lib/libmimx-ispell.la Are you referring to: "Removing .la files and replacing them by pkgconfig files remove the requirement. However, the transition needs to be coordinated in leaf-first order, or will cause problems found in libXcursor and libXrender. Bug# 363239 and Bug# 363057." Are you saying there are no leaf-nodes depending on libm17n-dev that require libtool support? cya, # -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org