Evgeni Golov a écrit : >> BTW, there are many things that shouldn't be in the .orig.tar.gz (such >> as CVS directories, for a start)... For future releases, it might be >> relevant to repackage the upstream tarball. > > Yupp, but thats a different issue, not relevant here and now :)
Sorry for the misinformation... CVS directories were there in the past, but not any more now :) >>> And for really closing 510919: could either ocaml-nox or omake provide >>> a ocamldep-omake symlink, pointing to ocamldep? Just to make sure we >>> (or actually you :P) don't break any user-scripts. >> This sounds like a dirty visible hack to me, I don't agree with this >> proposal. Are there so many people hard-coding ocamldep-omake in their >> scripts? Doesn't it sound reasonable to force people to update their >> scripts now? > > Dunno if there are people hardcoding it, I don't do any ocaml stuff. > But you should consider adding a debian/NEWS file, saying > ocamldep-omake is gone now, so users notice this fact on upgrade and > not when their stuff is failing. Done. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
