-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 10:49:18PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: >On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 at 21:01:12 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Does that mean that I should not simply upload a fixed release to >> unstable, but wait and depend on that newer release of dbus? >> >> Or (looking at the changelog entry now) does it perhaps mean that my >> change will work both now and (hopefully) with your new release of dbus, >> but that my old sugar version will _not_ work with newer dbus? > >I've tested lenny's sugar package with the D-Bus that's targeting lenny, >and it does work, so this bug obviously isn't particularly critical (in >particular, this bug doesn't block #503532 and is hence not RC for lenny). > >I believe that all four combinations of (buggy, fixed) sugar and >(old, new) D-Bus should work in practice, so you shouldn't need to >introduce any versioned dependencies.
Excellent. Thanks for clarifying. - jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklh+NAACgkQn7DbMsAkQLiIgwCeLUi9YaXzJJ0uesdtUPWqKT1c zSUAoJF8vOgtClMFtU2dTiNQ0LbagQqI =3Cpb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
