On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:20:25AM +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote: > > > Christian, I made a change to the debian package - NMU change, as I > > > was tired of aptitude installing debian's official version of luola > > > over mine. > [..] > > Good to hear that it is working now. I looked through your patch and merged > > back changes to my codebase. I then made a cleaned up patch that applies to > > luola 1.2.7 sources. Could you check if it works correctly? > > Christian, Calle's patch does not apply cleanly over the Debian > source; are there any changes in the code itself to make luola dfsg > free? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian_work/packages/bugs/luola/tmp/luola-1.2.6.dfsg# > patch -p0 < ../../luola-1.2.7-1.patch > patching file src/console.c > Hunk #2 succeeded at 339 (offset 5 lines). > patching file src/demo.c > patching file src/lcmap.c > patching file src/lconf.c > Hunk #4 succeeded at 659 (offset 11 lines). > Hunk #5 succeeded at 670 (offset 11 lines). > patching file src/ldat.c > patching file src/levelfile.c
You are applying a 1.2.7 patch to the 1.2.6 source. To make it dfsg free I removed a font and edited two config files or so, no changes in the code. Calle might have changed the code a little bit for 1.2.7, besides replacing the non-free font by a free one. But the patch applies fine, only a few lines offset, I would not worry about that. I don't think I received the patch from Calle, can somebody send it to me? Then I can include it in the first upload of 1.2.7 to debian. BTW if any of you knows something about writing manpages, I could use some help with Bug#300642 to make luola bugfree... Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
