Hi.

About the snow problem, I would propose the following solution:

1) Dirk should file a RC bug against snow to document what is
going on, feel free to clone this one for this purpose.
2) Then upload his original snow package with a suitable version
number (you will probably need to use an epoch), closing the RC
bug.
3) This will go to NEW, since the binary package isn't
present in unstable anymore. But we can probably fast-track this.
4) This will then overwrite the new snow package and if Jari wants
to upload his package again, he will need to choose another source
package name.

If anyone sees any issues with this proposed solution, please speak
up fast.

Using the source package name snow for the new package is really no
option since it just confuses all the websites and other infrastructure
to no end (and the users, too...).

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <dj...@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to