Hi. About the snow problem, I would propose the following solution:
1) Dirk should file a RC bug against snow to document what is going on, feel free to clone this one for this purpose. 2) Then upload his original snow package with a suitable version number (you will probably need to use an epoch), closing the RC bug. 3) This will go to NEW, since the binary package isn't present in unstable anymore. But we can probably fast-track this. 4) This will then overwrite the new snow package and if Jari wants to upload his package again, he will need to choose another source package name. If anyone sees any issues with this proposed solution, please speak up fast. Using the source package name snow for the new package is really no option since it just confuses all the websites and other infrastructure to no end (and the users, too...). Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <dj...@debian.org> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org