tags 509070 wontfix
thanks

On 18/12/2008 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> I'd suggest that timeout support is readded because it could be  
> useful, e.g. when some script tries to map a dm-crypt device, but the  
> usb-stick containing the key is not inserted, but the device is not so  
> important for that script.
> Perhaps the same applies for the boot process.

Hey Christoph,

as described in several other bugreports and mailinglist discussions,
it's currently impossible to implement timeouts in a clean way. Both
checkfs.sh and mountall.sh from initscripts will fail for a nonexistant
device that is configured in /etc/fstab.

The only way to prevent broken boot process for missing filesystems is
to use the noauto option in /etc/fstab. But if the filesystem isn't
mounted automatically anyway, then you can use the noauto option for the
dm-crypt device in /etc/crypttab as well.

It's not that useful after all to start the dm-crypt mapping
automatically if the device needs to be mounted manually anyway.

Additionally, the problems with keyfiles and keyscripts come into mind.

That's why I tag that bugreport as wontfix. And I don't see a reason to
implement timeout support as long as the checkfs.sh and mountall.sh
initscripts don't support some flag like 'ignore-missing' to /etc/fstab.

greetings,
 jonas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to