Il giorno lun, 22/12/2008 alle 15.14 +0100, Andreas Putzo ha scritto: > > About that, isn't that the case to follow josm versioning (i.e. svn release) > > instead of the timestamp-like version used currently ? > > My understanding is that this is more or less a matter of personal > preference. But josm now has a 'latest more or less stable' svn revision > which might be easier to distinguish than a timestamp-like version.
I think too it's better to use the svn release versioning, which is easier to match with the upstream status than the timstamp. And also the "more or less stable" revision is a good idea, because makes us able to select the better version to package. Unfortunately upstream has also made some not very Debian friendly changes, mainly those who concern i18n. We'll have to create the tarballs picking stuff both from svn.openstreetmap.org and from josm.openstreetmap.de, and then adapt the ant files to behave correctly. I'm planning to have some time to try to do so during the Christmas Holidays (this year I begun with university, so I haven't had much time so far...). Cheers, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascell...@gmail.com> Pisa, Italy Web: http://giomasce.altervista.org SIP: g.mascell...@ekiga.net Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org GPG: 0x5F1FBF70 (FP: 1EB6 3D43 E201 4DDF 67BD 003F FCB0 BB5C 5F1F BF70)
signature.asc
Description: Questa รจ una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
