On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 08:27:51AM +0000, Rene Engelhard wrote: > tag 509193 - wontfix > thanks > > Hi, > > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 02:39:15PM +0000, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > found 509193 1:2.4.1-4 > > > severity 509193 wishlist > > > tag 509193 + wontfix > > > retitle 509193 please don't depend on ttf-liberation > > > thanks > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > > ttf-liberation fonts are really ugly (at least I think so), and I'm > > > > totally unable to remove them _and_ keep openoffice.org because of > > > > that.. > > > > > > openoffice.org is just a metapackage. No harm when removing it. > > > > > > > Please downgrade the dependency to a mere recommends. > > > > > > No. ttf-liberation is the only alternative instead of msttcorefonts when > > > you want not use a installer package which installs non-free fonts. > > > > then depends ttf-liberation | msttcorefonts or sth. > > That can be done, although I still dislike depending on something > which is in contrib and sole purpose is to install non-free fonts > from M$...
well that's a valid point, I'm not sure it's valid to depend upon msttcorefonts even as a second alternative. That's why I thought of ttf-liberation as a recommends first. It would be pulled by apt or aptitude, though people can remove it without removing the metapackage that *IS* handy. THe problem with ttf-liberation is that it supersedes msttcorefonts while it's nowhere near being a decent replacement on my screen. It would be dead space I wouldn't care, but it actually degrades my experience. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madco...@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp6ikQjhAN1d.pgp
Description: PGP signature