On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Paolo <oo...@users.sf.net> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 04:36:05PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > ... >> #509266: pdf2djvu does not seem to keep bookmarks > ...
>> Package: djvudigital >> Version: 3.5.17-3 >> Severity: important > > hi, > > this was assigned Bug#500919, and is related to > >> which I converted to DjVu using djvudigital and gsdjvu 1.3. All went fine, > > how is it related to pdf2djvu? besides my own mentioning, that is: You have mentionned that pdf2djvu an alternative of gsdjvu is not working as expected, therefore I feel free to send a bug report to pdf2djvu nothing more. >> 1. index tree is lost (ok, that's another bug's subject) >> 2. links are lost >> so I tried same conversion with pdf2djvu and, while 1. above holds still >> true, the resulting DjVu had the internal links (jumps from index to content > > so I knew pdf2djvu - for comparison - already kept bookmarks (but pdf2djvu > looses the index tree anyway), Could you please give me some clue about index tree? Perhaps seending me a simple example of an document with an index tree. Google does not help. Does you means outline. If so it is fixed in the last upstream version of pdf2djvu. > the problem was with djvudigital - gsdjvu > actually, which isn't in Debian so perhaps the bug shouldn't be closed till > upstream tells us whether gsdjvu is going to be fixed or not. Upstream ask for an example file. Could you please send me an exemple pdf file and corresponding djvu file? They do not have enougth information for solving the bug. Thank you very much. Regards Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
