Without a test document, I cannot be sure.
However I strongly suspect that this is the same issue as
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1997033&group_id=32953&atid=406583

In other words, the pdf link handling in gs is insufficient.
Gsdjvu (which is not a debian package) is based on the pristine ghostscript.
Nothing will happen until somebody fixes gs, and until we build a new
gsdjvu on the basis of the fixed ghostscript.

As mentionned by ubanus in the sourceforge bug report,
it is possible to combine gsdjvu graphics accuracy
with pdf2djvu better handling of pdf files.
Of course this is a tweak..

Eventually the solution would be to port or recode the better 
gsdjvu rendering into pdf2djvu. This could happen if AT&T agrees 
to adjust the gsdjvu license, or if the patent expires...


- L.






-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to