It's not the cleanest code I've seen, but it seams to be correct.
-- Remco Post -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
actually, this patch is invalid. The fact that nfcapd cant start is
because of an unclean shutdown, leaving the ols shared memory segment
floating around while it shouldn't. At first glance it appears as if
you're right, but look at lines 221 and further. Either the page
already exists, while the code expects it not, or it doesn't ( shm_id
<= 0 ) in which case there is either an error or a new segment gets
created.
