Hi Loïc!

(I have removed -release for now)

On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:36:43 +0100
Loïc Minier <l...@dooz.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/imagemagick/507269/diff-control.txt
> 
>  Hmm why didn't you add the Provides to libmagickwand-dev (which
> depends on libmagickcore-dev and so pulls everything which used to be
> there)?

Because the majority of the packages don't need to also have
libmagickwand-dev and libmagickwand1 installed to be built. I was
thinking on the unnecessary packages that would be downloaded/installed
to build them.

> > nip2 - FTBFS
> 
>  Ok, these would go away (and I would guess xine-lib as well, as it
> uses Wand) if you move the Provides to wand-dev.

Isn't it acceptable to fix these packages that FTBFS and keep the
provides only on libmagickcore-dev?

Thank you!

Best regards,
Nelson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to