On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 23:11 +0100, Jordà Polo wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 05:29:24PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > You'll need to bump the package list versions ($*LIST_FORMAT at the top > > of Read_pkglists.pm) as otherwise using an existing laboratory produced > > by an earlier version of lintian will fail when splitting the fields. > > Thanks for reminding me about it. Btw, how about $LAB_FORMAT in > frontend/lintian? It probably needs to be updated too.
Judging from the surrounding comments, I'd say yes, but I'm quite prepared for someone who's more familiar with the lab setup to correct me. :) The changelog isn't awfully useful for working out when the format has been updated in the past, other than the (somewhat belated) bump to 8. > > Adding equivalent modifications for udeb packages would be good, now > > that we're no longer hiding the fact that the tags belong to those > > packages (see 18eab956f696a6bb4600765ff29f4443c6b79891). > > OK, I updated list-udebpkg, see attached patch. I'll commit it tomorrow > if there is nothing wrong with it. Looks good to me; thanks! My only possible minor nitpick would be that I'd prefer the .* in the source version matching expression to be .+, but that is being somewhat picky; feel free to ignore it. :) Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
