On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 03:55:34PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > reopen 508493 > thanks > > I'm not sure I understand why you closed the wishlist bug. A freeze, as > I understand it, is not about *never* installing a new version, but > rather *waiting* until the release is made. It's perfectly normal to > have a wishlist bug for a new version--it's not a demand for anything, > still less a request for breaking the freeze--just a note, "hey, this > would be good." > > Then, when the release is made, kernel version 2.6.27 (or later) can be > packaged and the wishlist bug closed. That's the point of wishlist > bugs. > > There is nothing inappropriate about a bug (wishlist or otherwise) being > filed which cannot be closed during the freeze; the correct response, as > I understand it, is to leave the bug open, perhaps with an email to the > bug log explaining the situation. > > But from the exasperated tone of your message, it seems likely that I > have misunderstood what a freeze means. I outline above my > understanding. Can you perhaps elaborate on what I have incorrectly > understood about what a freeze means?
snapshot builds of 2.6.27 are already available - see the wiki page Bastian directed you to. Obviously that's not the same as being in the archive proper, but that's not going to happen till after lenny. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
