On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:38:47AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > On 2008-12-11 09:14:23.00 Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey, no fair! > > > The deal was that boost1.37 be accepted into the archive before > > removing 1.36. With this removal we have gone from being 4 months out > > of date (Boost 1.36 was released in August) to 8 months out of date > > (Boost 1.35 released end of March). > > No, sorry. If you want to be able to deliver the greatest boost of the day, > teach them about API stability.
That's an old debate. You're welcome to engage with the Boost folks yourself. I believe they know about the issue but it's not the biggest priority for Boost. My role is to try to ensure that Debian keeps up with Boost. > We really, really do not want people to start using boost 1.36 now > and the best way to achieve that is... not offering boost 1.36 now. Thank you for making that choice for me. :-/ Respectfully: I and others disagree. I don't believe it is your position to choose for us. On that note, when will 1.37 be released from quarantine? Joerg? Thanks, -S
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
