On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 09:59:56AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Guido Günther] > > This looks like overkill and just reduces the readability. Wouldn't > > it be better if the the lsb log_* functions would look at an env var > > (LSB_VERBOSE or similar)? > > I believe each script writer need to decide on a per message basis if > the message should be visible when VERBOSE=no (or kernel option quiet) > is used, and thus believe it is the wrong approach to move the test to > the log_* functions. The skeleton example just happen to believe all > its messages should be hidden in quiet mode. But wouldn't it be better to make all the log_* functions look at LSB_VERBOSE by default and have a special set of functions that ignores $LSB_VERBOSE? I agree that it should be left to the script maintainer to decide what is important and what isn't but the way we do it looks a bit like overkill. -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
