On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:21:52PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:

> Nevertheless, we need to start at some (hopefully) near point in the
> future and find out what breaks with the new stack, which means
> switching to libraw1394-2.0.x, first.
> 
> Stefan Richter and me have fixed a crash in libraw1394-2.0.0's ARM code.
> libraw1394-2.0.0 claims to be transparently backward compatible with the
> old stack, the one which was just re-enabled. So I don't see why not to
> update libraw1394.
[...]

There is a good reason not to update to libraw1394-2.0.0, and that is that
instead of working, it crashes with certain applications. Let me put it clear
that Debian is not a dumping ground for buggy software. Most users are not
interested in bèta-testing, they want _working_ software. Even those using
unstable. 

Once libraw1394 does not crash with all programs I test anymore, I will at
least put it in experimental. When the basic functionality is working fine and
applications depending on libraw1394 are useable to some extent again, I will
certainly upload it to unstable. Note that we are in a freeze, so until lenny
is released I can not upload libraw1394-2.x to unstable anyway, only to
experimental.

> Next week, libraw1394-2.0.1 is expected to be released, including all
> the fixes we have so far.

That is great. I will try it out as soon as it is released, and if it no longer
crashes I will upload it to experimental.

> Note that Juju still doesn't support everything we had on the old stack,
> especially when talking about ISO streaming.

Until this known bug which is fixed I will not upload the new libraw1394 to
unstable, since it would break applications which work with the older versions
of libraw1394.

> We'd also need some more system integration, perhaps the Fedora way?:
> 
>    
> http://ieee1394.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Juju_Migration#Permissions_and_ownership_for_.2Fdev.2Ffw.2A

That looks nice, I'll use that.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
      Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to