Hi!

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  I think this is going to be a painful transition if we move the
>  packages as is to unstable.  It would make the transition much smoother
>  if we provided compatibility libmagick++9-dev and libmagick9-dev
>  packages.

While I understand [1], I said 3 months ago [2] that it wouldn't be an
"easy" transition.
Last time that I did a test, only some packages would FTBFS with the
new ImageMagick package. I have opened wishlist bugs against them and
provided patches with the fixes [3] (maybe not the correct fixes, but
they give the idea of what is necessary to change; from what I
remember, there are already 2 packages that are fixed in
experimental).

[1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/301618
[2] 
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/188773/comments/4
[3] http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/imagemagick/transition/

The transition is just a replace libmagick9-dev -> libmagickcore-dev
(and, if necessary, libmagickwand-dev too), libmagick++9-dev ->
libmagick++-dev, plus fixing the more or less 5 packages that will
FTBFS.

My intention is still wait for Lenny to be released, send a message
saying "I will upload the new imagemagick package to unstable in X
days, you need to do foo and bar and I will NMU your package in Y days
for the transition" to the maintainers that still didn't upload a
fixed package to experimental.

>From my point of view, keeping a transitional libmagick++9-dev and
libmagick9-dev will only delay the problem for some time [see: Lenny
gets released; we upload the new imagemagick to unstable (with the
transitional packages) and Squeeze gets released with them; in Squeeze
+ 1 we remove the transitional packages. I am sure that there will be
packages still depending on libmagick++9-dev and libmagick9-dev at
this time and I don't want to have this work 2 releases away]. As I
said, my plan is to do the transition in Lenny + 1 (and without the
need of transitional packages).

I may be wrong and the other maintainers (Luciano and Daniel) may
disagree, but I don't want to think and work on the transitional
packages for a problem that just hits Ubuntu now.

Best regards,
Nelson



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to