Hello Lars, On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:47:13PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > The -std=c99 option means that you want strict compliance to the 1999 > version of the C standard. That standard does not define struct timespec > or nanosleep in <time.h> or anywhere else. Thus, there is no bug.
struct timespec and nanosleep are POSIX, and should be defined in time.h according to SUSv3 (see, e.g., http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/nanosleep.html). I don't see why strict C99 compliance should affect that header. I think it is a bug. With kind regards, Baurzhan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
