There have been some changes in this. Firstly, the relevant FAQ has clarified some problems about whether servers must have the opportunity to download client source code; see http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mobile.funambol.user/1391
Secondly, ftpmasters have a "working opinion" that AGPL meets the DFSG and a rationale will apparently be added to this report; see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506042 I think all the remaining concerns which need addressing in that rationale are around the vague/ambiguous terms, use cost and its background. Out of the list of 8 URLs, only 2 remain relevant:- http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/09/msg00032.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/03/msg00380.html I think there may be some third-party circumvention loopholes, but the DFSG don't require copyleft that actually works, so they're irrelevant. Hope that helps, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
