Package: autofs
Version: 4.1.4+debian-2.1
Severity: normal

During the outsourcing of my current job, I've had need to mount a
couple DFS (yes, the archaic DCE/DFS combo) filesystems.

On the AIX boxen, I did this:
1) mkdir /...
2) add a direct mount to /etc/auto_master (indirect doesn't work ?!?)
3) add /... -<options>  <server>:/...   to /etc/auto.direct

And things just worked fine, so I thought I'd simplify my life and make
the Linux servers (already doing NFS/AFS/CIFS) able to mount the paths
as well.

So I replicated the steps 1-3 above (and indirect mounts also failed ?!?)

But when I restarted autofs, I get this little gem in the log:

automount[18849]: cache_ghost: entry in file:/etc/auto.direct not valid map 
format, key /...

Now, I don't even have the -g/--ghost option turned on !

It appears that someone was trying sanity tests (disallow /. and /..),
but didn't contemplate their being anything after /.. (like another .,
or any other character)...

Clearly, the length of the key must also be taken into consideration !


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny-sid
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), 
(500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.27.7 (SMP w/1 CPU core; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages autofs depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.7-16     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  ucf                           3.0010     Update Configuration File: preserv

Versions of packages autofs recommends:
ii  module-init-tools             3.4-1      tools for managing Linux kernel mo
ii  nfs-common                    1:1.1.4-1  NFS support files common to client

autofs suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
* autofs/upgrade-from-broken-version:



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to