On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:58:36AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Fri 2008-11-21 02:24:02 -0500, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > > > Hello, this does not seem to be a gnutls error. The server merely asks > > for renegotiation, gnutls-cli ignores it (legal behavior) and server > > does not like it thus sends a fatal alert. > > Do you think this is exposing a bug in mod_ssl, then? If it is legal > behavior to ignore a renegotiation, it seems to me that > SSLVerifyClient optional should not cause the server to terminate the > connection if a rehandshake is rejected. Should we clone this bug, or > open a new report against apache or openssl?
IIUC what will happen in this case is that mod_ssl puts OpenSSL into the state where it expects a full handshake - if it receives any app_data packets OpenSSL treats thas a hard failure. And slso IIUC - this results in the server sending a ChangeCipherSpec message on the wire - and the client has no option to ignore that in TLS, right? joe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
