Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > OK, i'm now sure that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and not just > due to something wacky in libneon (though there may be libneon bits as > well). Here's a way to duplicate the problem without using libneon. [...] > - Simple Client Mode: > > *** Non fatal error: Rehandshake was requested by the peer. > *** Fatal error: A TLS fatal alert has been received. > *** Received alert [10]: Unexpected message > *** Server has terminated the connection abnormally. > ---------------------------------
Hello, this does not seem to be a gnutls error. The server merely asks for renegotiation, gnutls-cli ignores it (legal behavior) and server does not like it thus sends a fatal alert. However which version of gnutls-cli is that? Can you try with the latest? For neon to solve this, it has to perform a handshake after the rehandshake request has been required. regards, Nikos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
