On Thursday 20 November 2008 16:24:47 Modestas Vainius wrote: > Followup the bug #384573, reattach your current attachment and try to > negate the arguments why this bug should be unmarked as wontfix. It also > looks rather intrusive to me and I'm afraid it could break other encodings. > > However, what is the most important and a real showstopper, there is NO > librcc-dev in Debian.
I build deb packages for librcc and librcd, mayby i create package libtag-rusxmms and write Conflicts and Replaces for this? How i understand this marks give chouse for users - select patched and no patched package - and by default non patched of couse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
