On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 17:24 -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:29:22PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > >Until your package is ready to provide md5sum itself, we need something > >to make sure it's there -- we can't have a system without it. The > >diversion has been working for the last six months, and seems to have > >not upset anybody. > > It's upset me. If you'd simply not fucked around with an incorrect > diversion I could just upload a coreutils with a replaces: and there > would be no problem at all. > You can still do that? In fact, you still need a Replaces: header to support sarge->etch upgrades?
Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
