On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:37:32 -0500, "Norman Ramsey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > It should be possible for dlocate to depend on mlocate, not just > slocate or locate. Or otherwise a bug report should be filed against > mlocate.
Feel free to submit a bug against mlocate then. As far as dlocate is concerned, see bug #494673. I'll leave it up to the dlocate maintainer to decide whether to close or WONTFIX or simply leave this open as wishlist (suggest the latter, as it might become feasible if and when mlocate starts to provide the necessary infrastructure). /* era */ -- If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]