Excerpts from Chris Lamb's message of Sun Nov 16 14:12:25 -0600 2008: > Ah, thanks for that. My recommendation for kinda-botched releases like this > would be to increment the least-significant bit and release again. However, > you seemed to have caught it early.
That particular case didn't really warrant it, since no files in Django changed and it was just a matter of retrieving the copy of the package the checksums were generated from. But speaking of version bumps... one of our developers noted that the packaging process for 1.0.1 omitted a directory needed by django.contrib.gis, and so we *are* going to bump to 1.0.2 and re-roll, with a package due on Tuesday: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/msg/b32f923a257c0ee4 -- James Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
