Vincent Fourmond dixit: > Hello, > > While looking at the description of mksh, I was surprised to read >the following things: > > * "the build environment requirements are autoconfigured" > This is completely irrelevant for Debian where users don't have to build > the package
While you're right on this one, I wonder about the benefit of adjusting the description for Debian vs the benefit of having a package description shared among all ports. But I guess I'll fix this point in the next update. > * "The mksh-static binary is a version of mksh, linked against dietlibc > if possible," > > Well, is it or not linked with dietlibc ???? Providing a binary package, > you *should* know ;-) ! It is, if possible. Please see the dietlibc package for a list of supported architectures – not all Debian ports are among these. bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
