Joey Schulze ha scritto: > Hi, > > I only want to add a note saying that the new version of dmraid (that > has the patch to rename raid45 to raid456 removed) should be fine. > > I have been able to detect the raid on the machine I was working on, > i.e. dmraid asked for the proper dm target and the kernel was able > to direct the request to the dm-raid45 module that I've built from > Hans patch with local adjustments.
Hi, at this moment current dm-raid45 patch [1] is using the target that the dmraid code originally expected. I'm working in unofficial dm-raid45 module package, if you want you can test a preliminary package [2][3] (Note that .iso is broken) You need to patch the kernel [4] or if you have amd64 you can use my .deb [5][6] Anyway to fix this bug, I need a simple hack from kernel team [7], and after I could package dm-raid45 module [8]. [1]http://people.redhat.com/heinzm/sw/dm/dm-raid45/dm-raid45_2.6.27_20081027.patch.bz2 [2]http://ctu.iuculano.it/dm-raid45/ [3]http://ctu.iuculano.it/dm-raid45/dm-raid45-source_20081027_all.deb [4]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=14;att=0;bug=496893 [5]http://ctu.iuculano.it/dm-raid45/linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64_2.6.26-9+dmraid1_amd64.deb [6]http://ctu.iuculano.it/dm-raid45/linux-headers-2.6.26-1-amd64_2.6.26-9+dmraid1_amd64.deb [7]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496893 [8]http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504165 Cheers, Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
