hello, > could you please justify why you reopened the bug report and reassigned
i believe that this is the same bug since hald is exhibiting the same behavior as xfce4-battery-plugin. i reassigned to hal because i wanted to retain the past information in the bug log (in case any of it is useful), rather than opening a new one. > it to hal, when Yves-Alexis clearly said this is not a bug is hald. his was a response to only the second part of a compound question. he was saying that an xfce utility did not instruct hald to operate in this manner -- hence the problem must be with hald itself. this is why i have reassigned the bug hal. hope this sufficiently answers your question. best wishes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
