Hello Micah,
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Micah Anderson wrote:
* Tomas Pospisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-10 09:57-0500]:
It seems to me that vserver-copy is easier to use and more powerful than
vserver -s build blah blah. But whatever vserver-copy as shipped by
Debian has been dead now for three years. What about killing it before
lenny comes out so that it doesn't confuse yet another generation of
sysadmins?
*t
Can you be more specific? You are saying that vserver-copy is easier to
use than 'vserver -s build...', but that the version of vserver-copy
shipped with the debian util-vserver package is out of date? Where is
the newer, easier to use vserver-copy you are referring to?
Are you talking about the vserver-debianutils package?
I'm talking about the util-vserver package referenced by bug #307980.
The vserver-copy tool as shipped in Debian "etch" isn't able to copy with
vserver's current configuration format. I have not tried whether the one
in lenny is able or not.
If it does understand the "new" (a few years old by now) format, then
you could close the bug. If it can't then it'd be good to move
vserver-copy to the side (as suggested by yourself here [1].)
Thanks,
*t
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307980#17
PS: the bts seems to be down atm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
